Why is this important: The 2015 reform was one of the most debated policies in Albania, sparking intense discussions among politicians and academics alike. However, ten years later, university faculties widely agree that institutional autonomy has increased. Despite this, a newly drafted document, Higher Education Strategy 2030, highlights the need for legislative amendments to address emerging challenges and align the education system with modern demands.

Why is this important: Kosovo’s path to full international recognition and EU integration remains a major geopolitical challenge. President Begaj’s speech reinforced Albania’s commitment to advocating for Kosovo on the global stage and strengthening cooperation between the two nations.

Why is this important: The information about alleged extravagant spending is one of the most contentious aspects of the SPAK case against Veliaj and his wife. The manner of the public release of these details has reignited accusations that SPAK is engaging in character assassination rather than conducting a fair judicial process. This is not the first time SPAK has been accused of playing politics by selectively leaking or releasing highly sensitive, and at times unrelated details, about suspects’ files to the media. In many instances, these have resulted in distorted facts or outright falsehoods, raising concerns about the prosecution’s credibility and impartiality.

Why is this important: Berisha’s rhetoric against SPAK has taken an increasingly aggressive turn as his legal troubles have deepened. The irony of his statements is also striking—just days ago, Berisha labeled a gathering of Socialist Party supporters outside the Special Court as an attack on the justice system,  while now leading his own protest outside SPAK’s doors, threatening to dissolve SPAK and issuing direct threats against its prosecutors.

Why is this important: Under normal circumstances Manjani and Xhafaj do not agree on much. That they now share the same concerns about SPAK’s investigation is raising fundamental questions about due process and selective prosecution. Their statements also highlight long-standing issues with SPAK’s reliance on anonymous denunciations and media leaks, which have repeatedly been used for political purposes.