Why is it important: Salianji’s conviction stems from his role in a controversial case from 2018, where he accused the brother of former Interior Minister Fatmir Xhafaj, of involvement in a drug trafficking conspiracy. The case drew widespread attention in Albania, as it involved allegations of political protection for criminals. However, investigations by the Prosecution revealed that the evidence had been fabricated with Salianji playing a key role in the affair. The High Court’s decision signals a continuation of Salianji’s legal struggles and further solidifies the judiciary’s stance on the case.

Why is it important: Albania has held EU candidate status for over a decade. Internal challenges within the country, as well as issues within the EU itself, have delayed the accession process for Albania, which is widely regarded as one of the most pro-European countries in the region. Securing EU membership would not only enhance Albania’s political standing but also reinforce legal reforms, democratic principles, and economic growth.

Why is this important: The EU integration process is a national priority, and its success hinges on political unity. EU officials have repeatedly stressed the need for cooperation between Albania’s ruling and opposition parties to progress through the negotiation chapters. Despite unanimous support for European membership, actual political actions, not just rhetoric, will determine Albania’s ability to advance towards EU accession.

Why it matters: Even before Von der Leyen’s letter the Abania – Italy model was being closely watched by EU leaders desperate to find solutions to the increasingly polarizing migration problem. Indeed the awareness that the agreement with Italy could contribute to a EU level solution to the problem may well have been one of the key considerations behind the Albanian Government’s decision to agree to work with Italy. Von der Leyen’s letter seems to confirm that the model is now viewed as a possible solution and that there is a shift in the EU on migration management.  By creating external hubs in third countries, the EU aims to streamline the asylum process and prevent dangerous journeys across the Mediterranean. The Italy-Albania agreement, which serves as a model, could offer practical insights on how to handle asylum claims while keeping migrants outside EU borders until their applications are processed.

Why is this important: This marks a crucial step in Albania’s path toward EU membership, highlighting the country’s commitment to fulfilling the necessary reforms and meeting European standards. The opening of the first cluster, covering fundamental areas such as rule of law, public administration, and economic policies, demonstrates Albania’s dedication to aligning with EU policies and progressing through the integration process.

Why is it important: The win come after Albania lost two games in a row sparking criticism of the team. Just a month ago, Georgia defeated Albania in Tirana, adding extra weight to the victory.

Why is it important: The bill aims to introduce a new legal framework for scientific research and expand the entities eligible to conduct it. However, it has raised concerns, particularly over its potential impact on academic freedom and university autonomy. The creation of the National Science Council, composed in part of government officials, has been a key point of contention.

Why is this significant: The Growth Plan incentivises the Western Balkans’ preparations for EU membership by bringing forward some of its benefits which will directly benefit the citizens of the Western Balkan countries. This in turn should significantly accelerate the speed of the enlargement process and the growth of the region’s economies.

Why is it important: The Berlin Process remains crucial for accelerating EU integration and enhancing regional cooperation in the Western Balkans. As the 10th-anniversary summit, this year’s meeting provided an important opportunity to assess progress and chart the way forward, particularly in light of ongoing challenges such as unresolved disputes between Kosovo and Serbia.

Why is this important: On Saturday night, Kurti accused Serbia of escalating the situation by moving troops dangerously close to Kosovo’s border. “Serbia provoked once again, bringing its troops within 50 meters of our border,” Kurti said, adding that Kosovo’s security forces immediately detected the movement. Kurti assured the public that Kosovo’s security forces are fully prepared to respond to any threat, claiming the country has made significant investments in intelligence, security, and defense. However, KFOR explained that the troop movement was part of a regular patrol, planned and communicated in advance. The Kosovo Police were also informed, ensuring there was no cause for immediate concern.