Why is this important: Veliaj’s letter and courtroom intervention raise critical questions about due process in high-profile corruption trials, judicial transparency, and human rights standards in Albania. His case is now drawing attention not just politically, but potentially legally on an international scale, as he has signaled the possibility of appealing to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

Why is this important: The Constitutional Court will meet Thursday to decide whether to accept Rama’s appeal challenging the legality of the Special Court’s suspension of Balluku. At the heart of the case is whether courts can interrupt executive powers, and how that affects government operations.

Why is this important: Albania’s progress toward EU accession depends in part on key reforms that demonstrate transparency, accountability, and adherence to democratic standards. The lack of financial transparency in party funding and ongoing election irregularities have raised concerns domestically and internationally.

Why is this important: This marks a major step toward modernizing Albania’s property tax system, aligning it with European standards and boosting revenue collection. The reform is designed to ensure more equitable taxation based on real market values.

Why is this important: The decision could set a precedent over whether courts can suspend sitting cabinet members without violating the separation of powers. Rama argues that the Special Court’s action infringes on executive authority and threatens the constitutional roles of the Prime Minister, President, and Parliament.

Why is this important: The decision signals Vetëvendosje’s strategy to broaden its support base after failing to secure enough seats to form a government following the February 9 elections. By allying with like-minded parties, Vetëvendosje aims to consolidate the center-left and pro-reform vote.

Why is this important: The Constitutional Court is set to decide Tuesday whether to proceed with a full review of Rama’s appeal. At stake is a potential precedent about whether courts can suspend sitting cabinet members—something Rama argues would dangerously shift the balance of power between state institutions.

Why is this important: The surge in banking activity reflects growing use of formal financial channels and a more dynamic economy heading into the year-end. This is particularly evident in corporate payments, tax settlements, and international transfers.

Why is this important: The case could set a legal precedent on the limits of judicial authority over government officials. Rama claims the court’s action is not only unprecedented in Europe but also unconstitutional, asserting that such power lies exclusively with the Prime Minister, President, and Parliament.

Why is this important: Massive cash use in goods and service payments makes it difficult for tax authorities to track money flow, opening doors to fiscal evasion and weakening financial transparency.