Why is this important: Hill, a key figure in U.S. foreign policy in the Balkans and beyond, is best known in Albania for his role in reestablishing diplomatic ties between the U.S. and Albania after March 1991, after decades of communist isolation. His return, now as an author rather than an envoy, has reignited interest in his legacy and influence across the region.

Why is this important: The article argues that Veliaj’s ten month detention without trial exemplifies what can go wrong when anti-corruption efforts are pursued without safeguards for due process. As Albania continues its bid to join the European Union, the case is drawing increased attention from European legal experts, foreign lawmakers, and human rights observers who warn of potential political motivation and democratic backsliding. This stands in marked contrast to the unquestioning support shown by EU representatives toward the new justice institutions, despite growing evidence that while achieving notable results, these institutions are also showing a troubling tendency toward arbitrary practices and behaviors that would not be acceptable in EU member states.

Why is this important: The initiative underscores a growing divide between party leadership and influential members sidelined from parliamentary candidacy. Their calls for internal reform and broader inclusion come at a time when Berisha faces criticism for refusing to step down after electoral defeat, raising questions about accountability and renewal within the Democratic Party.

Why is this important: Veliaj’s letter and courtroom intervention raise critical questions about due process in high-profile corruption trials, judicial transparency, and human rights standards in Albania. His case is now drawing attention not just politically, but potentially legally on an international scale, as he has signaled the possibility of appealing to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

Why is this important: The Constitutional Court will meet Thursday to decide whether to accept Rama’s appeal challenging the legality of the Special Court’s suspension of Balluku. At the heart of the case is whether courts can interrupt executive powers, and how that affects government operations.

Why is this important: Albania’s progress toward EU accession depends in part on key reforms that demonstrate transparency, accountability, and adherence to democratic standards. The lack of financial transparency in party funding and ongoing election irregularities have raised concerns domestically and internationally.

Why is this important: This marks a major step toward modernizing Albania’s property tax system, aligning it with European standards and boosting revenue collection. The reform is designed to ensure more equitable taxation based on real market values.

Why is this important: The decision could set a precedent over whether courts can suspend sitting cabinet members without violating the separation of powers. Rama argues that the Special Court’s action infringes on executive authority and threatens the constitutional roles of the Prime Minister, President, and Parliament.

Why is this important: The decision signals Vetëvendosje’s strategy to broaden its support base after failing to secure enough seats to form a government following the February 9 elections. By allying with like-minded parties, Vetëvendosje aims to consolidate the center-left and pro-reform vote.

Why is this important: The Constitutional Court is set to decide Tuesday whether to proceed with a full review of Rama’s appeal. At stake is a potential precedent about whether courts can suspend sitting cabinet members—something Rama argues would dangerously shift the balance of power between state institutions.