Albanian PM quashes rumor of hosting 100,000 Gazans
A surprising rumor claiming that the Albanian government had agreed to host 100,000 Gazans sparked widespread puzzlement and alarm in Albania today. The claim, originating from Amit Segal, a prominent Israeli journalist and political commentator for Channel 12 News, gained traction due to Segal’s credibility. His report suggested that Albania, alongside Indonesia, was being considered as a host for Gazan refugees after neighboring Egypt and Jordan reportedly declined the idea.
Why is this important: Albania has a proud tradition of offering refuge to those fleeing persecution, from Jewish families during the Holocaust to Afghans escaping the Taliban and Iranian dissidents. However, hosting 100,000 Gazans would be an entirely different matter—not just due to logistical challenges but because of the significant societal, political, and diplomatic consequences it would bring.
An influx of this magnitude would fundamentally alter Albanian society overnight, creating strong resistance among the population. While Albania values its humanitarian commitments, public opinion would not support a decision perceived as destabilizing the country’s social fabric and cherished religious harmony.
Diplomatically, agreeing to such a proposal would undermine Albania’s role as a bridge between East and West. Albania has cultivated strong ties with Israel and Muslim-majority nations like Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE. Hosting Gazans would risk alienating these key eastern partners, with whom Albania shares robust cultural, religious, economic and political relations.
Most critically, despite its strong ties with Israel, Albanians do sympathize with the plight of Gazans. The memories of Kosovo’s ethnic cleansing in the 1990s remain fresh, and many Albanians would view such a relocation as condoning actions that echo their own painful history.
If such a request were made, the Albanian government would face a difficult dilemma with its U.S. allies, to whom it owes much in terms of its post-communist progress and NATO membership. However, agreeing to such a proposal would be almost impossible, particularly on the eve of elections, where it would amount to political suicide for the ruling party.
Context: The story spread rapidly on social media, prompting widespread speculation and concern. Prime Minister Edi Rama stepped in to categorically deny the claim, calling it “absolutely fake” in a post on X (formerly Twitter). “Albania has not been asked by anyone, nor can we even consider taking on such a responsibility,” Rama stated.
While expressing solidarity with the people of Gaza, Rama emphasized Albania’s limitations: “We are proud of our strong friendships with Israel, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, and, of course, the Palestinian people. But Albania is not in the Middle East itself, and from the heart of Europe, we cannot do more than any other European country in such a matter.”
Where did the rumor originate: The journalist behind the story, Amit Segal, is one of Israel’s most influential political commentators, known for his high-profile coverage and analysis. Segal claimed Albania was being considered as an option after Egypt and Jordan reportedly refused to take in Gazan refugees. Despite the credibility of the source, the Albanian government swiftly shut down the possibility.
What’s next: While the Prime Minister’s response has quelled the rumor, the episode highlights the challenges faced by small nations like Albania in balancing relations with powerful allies and protecting national interests. The situation evokes memories of the 2013 Syrian chemical weapons controversy, when the Albanian government faced overwhelming public opposition after considering a U.S. request to dismantle Syrian chemical weapons on its soil. Protests forced the government to backtrack, underscoring the political cost of decisions seen as compromising Albania’s interests.
Go deeper
SPAK Chief defends electoral crime task force amid growing backlash
Published on February 21, 2025
Why is this important: The SPAK strategy is the latest move by the institution to ignite intense political and legal debate over the boundaries of its authority. While some civil society actors have expressed support, the task force—set to deploy prosecutors and investigators in the field during the electoral campaign—has drawn sharp criticism from politicians and jurists who argue it constitutes an overreach into political affairs and an infringement on citizens’ political rights. Prime Minister Edi Rama has openly opposed the initiative, calling it a “lapse in judgment” and insisting that political parties cannot be placed under surveillance during an election period. Others have pointed out that surveillance and prevention fall within the constitutional mandate of the police and intelligence services, not prosecutors.
PM Rama meets Tirana Municipality staff, condemns gathering outside SPAK and pledges full support
Published on February 21, 2025
Why is this important: Both SPAK and the Special Court (GJKKO) reacted to the gathering of Veliaj’s supporters outside their buildings, claiming that such actions intimidate judges and prosecutors. They also accused the police of failing to intervene, while law enforcement responded that it was a spontaneous gathering, not an officially planned protest.
PM lashes out at SPAK about election surveillance
Published on February 20, 2025
Why is this important: SPAK has created a special task force, split into two investigative teams, tasked with preventing and investigating electoral crimes before and after the May 11 elections. These teams will be deployed in all 12 electoral districts of Albania. This on-the-ground investigation approach is unprecedented, as prosecutors will be actively present during the campaign period where political parties hold their activities. While SPAK claims the initiative aims to combat vote-buying, critics argue it positions the anti-corruption body as an actor in the electoral campaign, rather than an impartial observer.