Breaking news: Former President Ilir Meta arrested by SPAK amid corruption and money laundering allegations
Photo: Ilir Meta
Ilir Meta, leader of the Freedom Party (PL) and former President of Albania, was arrested today on the outskirts of Tirana while on his way to the party headquarters for a scheduled press conference at 13:40. His arrest follows an investigation by SPAK into financial misconduct, corruption, and money laundering.
Why is this important: Meta’s arrest has sent shockwaves into Albania’s political landscape. Alongsident Berisha, Meta has been one of the most important political figures for the past 30 years. His arrest highlights SPAK’s intensified focus on fighting corruption among high-profile figures. It confirms that there are no untouchables in Albania anymore.
Context: Meta and his wife, Monika Kryemadhi, have been under investigation for several financial violations. SPAK has scrutinized their involvement in:
- Undeclared lobbying payments in the U.S.
- Alleged money laundering using offshore companies.
Meta is also implicated in the CEZ-DIA affair, a controversial affair involving the privatization of the publicly owned energy distributor by the Czech energy company CEZ. Following the privatization in 2009 CEZ realized that there was a considerable debt due to unpaid bills. Therefore, CEZ signed a deal with a friend of Ilir Meta, who set up a company called DIA, in order for him to help in collecting the debt. However, the whole ordeal ended with DIA receiving millions without doing any work at all thanks to Ilir Meta’s lobbying and the support it received from Berisha’s government at the time.
Meanwhile, his wife Monika Kryemadhi has been placed under a court appearance order as part of the same investigation. Meta and Kryemadhi are currently undergoing divorce procedures.
During a press following the news of the arrest, former Prime Minister Sali Berisha, currently under house arrest, criticized the arrest as politically motivated, accusing Prime Minister Edi Rama of manipulating SPAK to target opposition leaders. Berisha stated: “Persecuting Meta is purely political. Rama aims to eliminate political opposition.”
Go deeper
Kosovo PM warns of Serbian aggression amid rising tensions and internal challenges
Published on November 22, 2024
Why is this important: Kurti’s statement underscores the enduring tensions in the Western Balkans where the dialogue between Serbia and Kosovo has practically been frozen. It also highlights Kosovo concerns over Serbia’s growing assertiveness. Framing Belgrade’s actions as a continuation of the “Greater Serbia” project, Kurti warned that Serbia poses a direct threat not only to Kosovo but also to the broader region, including Bosnia-Herzegovina and Montenegro. The remarks are an attempt to mobilize international support. But they are also seen as an attempt by Kurti to rally his base and reinforce his nationalist credentials ahead of Kosovo’s 2025 elections, where he is considered the favorite despite an increasingly active opposition.
Albanian opposition announces November 26 protest against court ruling
Published on November 22, 2024
Why is this important: The Democratic Party’s (DP) decision to protest follows a ruling by the Constitutional Court that upheld the decision of the Special Structure Against Corruption and Organized Crime (SPAK) to bypass Parliament in enforcing measures against Berisha, including an obligation to appear before the prosecution and a travel ban. However, the Court deemed the travel ban imposed on Berisha as disproportionate. The decision to protest against the Constitutional Court ruling came as no surprise. DP and Berisha have a tradition of protesting against all court decisions that go against them.
President consults parties on election date amid Democratic Party boycott
Published on November 21, 2024
Why is this important: The election date is a constitutional prerogative of the President of the Republic. Traditionally, before announcing the date for parliamentary or local elections, the President consults with political parties, particularly those in Parliament, ensuring transparency and inclusivity in electoral planning. With no substantial disagreements, claims, or demands from parties regarding a specific election date, the DP’s refusal appears more as an attack on the President and an application of a traditional DP tactic of intimidating public officials by publicly accusing them of collusion with their opponents.